A Message to Libertarians About the FDA

| |

Top Tier Gear USA

drugs

“When I ran for a seat in the US Congress in 1994, I was very aggressive in demanding that we go after the FDA as a rogue criminal agency. Others, at the time, who were in favor of Health Freedom, said I should dial back my rhetoric; all we needed was a good law that would protect our right to take nutritional supplements. They were wrong then, and they’re still wrong.” (Running for Congress, Jon Rappoport)

Libertarians see big government as an obstruction to a free-market economy.

Some Libertarians believe the FDA is unnecessarily restraining commerce by driving up the cost of drugs and slow-tracking the approval of new drugs.

This is not how the game works. The FDA has clients, and those clients are the drug companies. On the whole, the FDA speeds up its drug approvals and thereby unleashes a torrent of toxic compounds on the public, killing, at a conservative estimate, 100,000 Americans every year, or a million Americans per decade.

The FDA is aiding and abetting criminal companies.

There are various solutions to this ongoing catastrophe that would depend on the basic honesty of Big Pharma. That honesty doesn’t exist. And the Dept. of Justice has no interest in waging a big-time war against Pharma.

Even in a society where Libertarian philosophy was the guide, government, however limited, would still have the role of protecting citizens from poisoning and rank fraud.

You could, of course, completely eliminate the government from having any say-so in the approval of medical drugs. You could have the Wild West. Let the buyer beware. Whether this would result in more deaths per year is an open question. It’s quite possible such a free system would eventually make people more cautious about what drugs they ingest; and thus the number of deaths would diminish. People wouldn’t be able to rely on the government to tell them what’s safe and what’s dangerous. In the long, long run, I believe this is so: no FDA is better than FDA.

I’ve been writing and speaking about dangerous medical drugs for almost 30 years, and I haven’t seen any limits placed on the basic FDA-Pharma partnership. This isn’t case of seeing a) government or b) corporations as the basic criminal. They’re both criminals, in collaboration with each other.

In a half-sane society, the big drug companies would have been prosecuted to the sky long ago. Their charters to do business in any state would have been revoked. Their CEOs, executives, and scientists would have been put behind bars for life. Even a limited federal government would have done that.

Here is where I’m in accord with Libertarians: people have right and the freedom to refuse medication, under any circumstances, even where the experts claim death will be the inevitable outcome. And people have the right to ingest any compounds they decide might help them.

If that were the basis for the system, then government couldn’t overwhelm the population with rules about mandatory vaccines (see also) and drugs.

In case you hadn’t noticed, all national health insurance plans, in whatever countries they’ve been established, are the road to perdition, because they can be manipulated to coerce citizens into accepting designated toxic medical treatments.

The freedom of refusal is the only protection when crime bosses rule both government agencies (like the FDA) and pharmaceutical companies.

Trying to reform Pharma or the government is a losing proposition.

In countries other than the US, the FDA-type agencies are likewise stacked with Pharma-favoring allies. These people have no conscience and no accountability. They are dangerous criminals who should be locked up.

But how is that possible when they are embedded within government?

If benign UFOs from another solar system were stationed above Earth, observing civilization at work, one of the first things they would notice is the mass-poisoning operation I’m writing about in this article, especially because it is taking place under the cover of delivering health to the planet’s population.

Someone aboard one of the ships would say, “Oh yes, this is a typical ‘greatest good for the greatest number’ cover story, concealing a war against the people. We see that everywhere.”

Save the village by destroying it.

If you want a clue about the FDA’s brazen attitude, search the phrase, “FDA why learn about adverse drug reactions.” You’ll find a page where the FDA readily admits, in capital letters, that 100,000 people die every year from the effects of medical drugs. (The page was still there the last time I checked.) Yet the FDA, the sole government agency responsible for certifying these drugs as safe and effective before they can be prescribed, takes zero responsibility for the death toll.

You would think this is a major story for mainstream media, to say the least. But you would be wrong.

A million deaths per decade doesn’t register on their radar, because they are in bed with the drug companies and the FDA.

There are several sources for the 100,000 death statistic in this article. The primary citation is: Dr. Barbara Starfield, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Journal of the American Medical Association, July 26, 2000, “Is US health really the best in the world?” Not long before her death, I interviewed Dr. Starfield. She told me no US government agency had ever contacted her about her findings.

Why would the federal government get in touch with her? It would be tantamount to confessing to mass murder.

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).


Contributed by Jon Rappoport of No More Fake News.

The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • I think we should bring RICO charges against as many government agencies as we can, and watch them run from the light like the cockroaches they are.

    • willierkennedy

      ❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖my pal’s close relative makes 72/hr on the PC….last tuesday I bought another Alfa Romeo since I been bringin in 9211$ this past 5 weeks besides, ten thousand last munth . without a request it is the best-work I’ve had . I truly started nine months/back and rapidly was making more than 69$, consistently . you could check here..…..

      —————►►►► tinyurl.com/Work9mReportOnlinehn3 __________________________________________________________________________ ➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽GOOTO THIS SITE AND CLICK NEXT LINK IN IT FOR WORK

    • Right to the Point

      Double Whammy! I like it…..

  • TellItAsIs99

    Big pharma funded vaccine and drug studies and funding to politicians, the FDA and medical advisory committees corrupt the vaccine-drug approval system. The corporate run media also receive billions in ad revenue from Big Pharma for their one sided coverage in support of vaccine use.
    Big Pharma knows that some kids can’t flush out the toxins in the vaccination shots resulting in harm and even death but they do not know which kids are vulnerable. It may be a gene defect issue. The vax shots are not guaranteed to work or be safe and at best only provide limited protection. Most of the Disneyland measle victims were already vaccinated for measles. And no randomized control trials have ever shown vaccines are safe and effective. The long term risk of giving the required list of vaccine shots is also unknown.
    Vaccines shots contain toxic adjuvants such as aluminum to stimulate immune reaction to generate anti-bodies to fight against the disease. However, it was better nutrition, sanitation, hygiene and hospital care that reduced infectious disease deaths to near zero before the first measles vaccine was given in 1963.
    Vaccines rates were well under 90%, the so called herd immunity minimum rate, in many parts of the country in the 1960s to 80s without any major outbreaks of diseases that the vaccines are claimed to protect against.
    Vaccine companies are protected against law suits from harmed families by the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act which set up a Vaccine Court funded by an added fee to the vaccines. The HRSA web site contians a vaccine injury table list. Over 3 billion dollars in awards have been paid out but not a penny from the vaccine companies who are guaranteed billions in yearly revenue.
    A well nourished child with a healthy immune system will fight off most infectious diseases and in the rare case of measles the child will have life-time immunity after recovery without taking the risk of toxic vaccines. Vaccines are a decision that must remain with the parents.
    Corporate interests have also lead to other controversial deadly treatments drugs. The highly deadly mandatory clot-buster TPA drug given in the ER for a non-life threatening moderate ischemic stroke. TPA has a history of deadly failed test trials and only a controversial possibility of a modest benefit. This stealth euthanasia drug is now starting to be delievered to home’s after the 911 call. Search: AAEM TPA position, The NNT TPA stroke, or in emergency medicine blogs or http://www.stroketreatmentrisktpa.co.nf for the stroke TPA drug controversy.

  • Gil G

    Yeah right the success of Big Quackery shows many people don’t care for medicine that actually works.

  • frankw

    It behooves us to monitor for ourselves what medications we take and the possible negative side effects they produce. Read the literature that comes with your prescription. You might be shocked to find the potential effects, up to and including death, are right there for you to see. Decide for yourselves whether its worth the risk.

  • SovereignPatriot88

    Wherever large sums of money are involved, there is corruption. People will always be greedy even at the expense of people’s lives. Most people who are complacent enough to believe that government has their best interests in mind will not question what is going on. They believe that because these agencies exist for their protection that they would never approve a drug that was neither safe or effective just to get rich. But they have, and will continue to do so until they are stopped. People need to be made aware of this corruption and fraud. Most will require proof before they believe it. Some will never believe it even in the face of irrefutable evidence. Because of the “normalcy bias” or “cognitive dissonance” people will be stuck on stupid. People should question things, especially life threatening poison masquerading as medicine, just by mentioning that there could be a problem with it. And once they start questioning it, they should be able to find enough evidence on their own to prove to themselves that the FDA and the government are corrupt.
    If only it were that easy.

  • abinico

    As of 8/23, the ADR page is still there and this is what it says:
    – Over 2 MILLION serious ADRs yearly
    – 100,000 DEATHS yearly
    – ADRs 4th leading cause of death ahead of pulmonary disease, diabetes, AIDS, pneumonia, accidents and automobile deaths
    – Ambulatory patients ADR rate—unknown
    – Nursing home patients ADR rate— 350,000 yearly
    Seems like the FDA is so brazen they are almost challenging the public to do something.