A Father’s Activism Changed the Law: Cops in WI No Longer Allowed to Investigate Themselves

| |

Top Tier Gear USA


Long before the Ferguson situation occurred, another young man named Michael B. was shot and killed by a police officer.

Here’s his story.

Ten years ago, 21-year-old Michael Bell Jr. pulled up to the house where he lived with his mom and sister in Kenosha, Wis., about an hour south of Milwaukee. A police officer who, according to a police report chose to follow Bell after observing his driving, arrived shortly after. A subsequent toxicology report showed that Bell had been drinking that night.

Dash cam footage from inside the squad car shows Bell exiting the vehicle he was driving, where he was confronted by the officer. The two walked off-camera, where police tried to arrest him. A struggle ensued, and while his mom and sister watched from the house, Bell was shot, point-blank, in the head. (source)

The police officers involved in Bell’s shooting claimed that the young man ignored commands to get back into his car, and that he fought with officers. Bell was eventually Tasered several times.

The struggle continued, apparently, and one of the officers yelled out that Bell had his gun.

Bell’s mother and sister, who were watching the altercation unfold, heard the officer as well and they tried to yell that Bell did not have the officer’s gun.

Then another officer then shot Bell in the head.

Bell’s father, Michael Sr., told NPR he’ll never forget the phone call he received from his oldest daughter that night:

“She called me up: ‘Dad, you need to come to the hospital, Michael’s been shot.’ And then she told me it was by a police officer,” Bell says. “And I just I figured it might’ve been shot in the leg or shot in the arm … but I came to find out that an officer placed a gun directly to my son’s temple and took his life.”

The Kenosha Police Department immediately conducted an investigation.

Within 48 hours, the department determined that the shooting was justified, that the use of force was proper, and that none of the officers had done anything wrong, reports NPR.

The Kenosha County district attorney declined to charge the officers, and said they acted with “courage and distinction.”

Michael Bell Sr. wasn’t having it.

“I was just completely appalled,” Bell says. He says he knew the police had not even talked to the witnesses or gotten the report back from the crime lab. “So to clear themselves in 48 hours, I was just completely flabbergasted.”

The lab reports came back and revealed that Michael Bell Jr.’s DNA and fingerprints were not found on the officer’s gun.

Bell, a retired lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Air Force, had been a part of “mishap investigations” before. So, he decided to launch his own investigation.

“I finally made a decision that we’re never going to get to the truth of the matter, unless we bring in our own personal investigators,” he says. “So we hired an investigative consultant who teamed up with a retired Kenosha police detective.”

Gina Barton of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel began covering Bell’s story in 2004. She told NPR that one of the experts hired by Bell came up with a theory that the gun had probably gotten caught on the rear-view mirror of the car near the scuffle. That mirror was in fact broken during the incident.

Barton, a law enforcement investigative reporter, said Wisconsin has had many officer-involved shootings and deaths.

She pointed out that one of the problems with this is that the officer’s own department conducts those investigations:

“So if you know this officer, if you’ve worked with him before, can you really be objective in terms of evaluating that shooting? And is it really proper for the police to be policing themselves?” Barton says.

The Bell family filed a wrongful death civil suit, and six years later, received a $1.75 million settlement. They used the settlement money to fund a grassroots campaign using billboards, newspaper ads, and commercials to question whether police officers should be allowed to investigate other officers who kill citizens while on duty.

From NPR:

The campaigning went on for years, but Barton says the message really gained momentum after another police incident in 2011, where a 22-year-old man died in the backseat of a police car. The medical examiner ruled the death a homicide.

Bell bought every available billboard in Milwaukee with slogans like: “When Police Kill, Should They Judge Themselves?”

“After we created enough ruckus, the unions ended up sitting down with us and talking with us,” Bell says. They told him that if he wanted to take the billboards down, they would work with him in crafting some the legislation he sought.

“I had formulated in my mind what really needed to occur here to make this process better,” he says.

The law they put forth, Wisconsin Assembly Bill 409, was signed into law by  Governor Scott Walker in April.

That law made Wisconsin the first state in the US to mandate that outside investigators must investigate officer-involved shootings.

Perhaps at some point, we will see laws like this enacted in more states. Hopefully it won’t take the loss of more innocent lives, hundreds of thousands of dollars in grassroots campaigning, and a decade of fighting to make that happen.


Rise of the Warrior Cop: The Militarization of America’s Police Forces

Police State – Ten Secrets The Police Don’t Want You To Know! “How To Survive Police Encounters!”

Police State USA: How Orwell’s Nightmare is Becoming our Reality

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by Lily Dane of The Daily Sheeple.

Lily Dane is a staff writer for The Daily Sheeple. Her goal is to help people to “Wake the Flock Up!”

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • cold340t

    Now thats how it’s DONE!!!!!!!!! More People like these please!!!!!!


    In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Thirteen

    AN ACT recognizing the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

    Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:

    1 Preamble and Statement of Intent. The general court hereby finds that:

    I. In 1810, a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibited titles of nobility and which later became known as the original Thirteenth Amendment, was introduced, passed both houses of Congress, and was sent to the states for ratification. On December 9, 1812, shortly after ratification by Virginia, New Hampshire became the thirteenth state to ratify the amendment. The amendment was therefore ratified by the requisite number of states and became Article XIII of the United States Constitution.

    II. During the War Between the States, otherwise known as the Civil War, the country was under martial law, and all executive orders made by President Lincoln were, in effect, law. After the war, laws made during that period were to be abated; yet, vestiges of martial law remained and presidents continued to write executive orders.

    III. The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, otherwise known as the Act of 1871, created a corporation in the District of Columbia called the United States of America. The act revoked prior legislation relative to the district’s municipal charter and, most egregiously, led to adoption of a fraudulent constitution in which the original Thirteenth Amendment was omitted.

    IV. Today, what appears to the public as the United States Constitution is not the complete document, as it was never lawfully amended to remove the Thirteenth Amendment. Instead, the document presented as the United States Constitution is merely a mission statement for the corporation unlawfully established in the Act of 1871.

    V. The purpose of this act is to recognize that the original Thirteenth Amendment, which prohibits titles of nobility, is properly included in the United States Constitution and is the law of the land. The act is also intended to end the infiltration of the Bar Association and the judicial branch into the executive and legislative branches of government and the unlawful usurpation of the people’s right, guaranteed by the New Hampshire constitution, to elect county attorneys who are not members of the bar. This unlawful usurpation gives the judicial branch control over all government and the people in the grand juries. As long as the original Thirteenth Amendment is concealed from the people, there shall never be justice or a legitimate constitutional form of government.

    2 New Chapter; Thirteenth Amendment. Amend RSA by inserting after chapter 1-A the following new chapter:



    1-B:1 Original Thirteenth Amendment. The following shall be recognized as the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution:

    Article XIII

    If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any Emperor, King, Prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them or either of them.

    3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.


  • James

    IL. has a citizen revue board as well. But once a cop was found guilty of wrong doing. The police got the law changed so they can only use and look at what evidence the police give them. No independent even asking a question except of the police and what they wish to squill off about it.. So worthless to the citizen it turned out to be.

  • Momus

    “On November 9, 2004, four officers were involved in shooting Bell in the head at his home in front of his mother and sister after a traffic stop of unknown reason. Bell was 21. Kenosha Police conducted their investigation and cleared themselves in two days. The Bell family asked District Attorney Robert Jambois for a coroners inquest and was denied.
    After his review, DA Jambois found the shooting justified.”

    Father of murdered son speaks from his website