The US government, under the leadership of the globalist puppet, Barack Obama, knows that the general American public is waking up to the tyranny that is being forced upon them. The divide and conquer ideal purveyed by the mainstream media (MSM) in America may be the second false flag that coerces us into having a “civil war” before the November 2012 elections.
Obama has amassed a “legion of lawyers” to flood the court system with support should problems arise from the voting process. The preparatory process alludes to the fact that they anticipate a problem with the voting.
The electronic voting booths are being pushed in time for the 2012 presidential election season as a way to answer to potential issues brought on my mail-in ballots by overseas Americans and US armed forces service members.
A report by Counting Votes 2012 says that electronically submitted ballots cannot be independently audited and are prone to being hacked. Additionally, electronic voting leaves nothing to recount in a dispute.
Pam Smith of the Verified Voting Foundation explains: “They’re trying to do a calculus and make it easy for the voter, and they may not realize the great risk they’re putting those votes at.”
The Obama campaign, Obama for America, is suing to restrict the right of military service people to be able to vote 3 days early in Ohio as is allowed by law. The Obama administration believes this law is “arbitrary” and has “no discernable rational basis.”
The National Defense Committee stated: “[f]or each of the last three years, the Department of Defense’s Federal Voting Assistance Program has reported to the President and the Congress that the number one reason for military voter disenfranchisement is inadequate time to successfully vote.”
In 2003, Aviel Rubin, Aviel D. Rubin, technical director of the Information Security Institute at Johns Hopkins University, along with a team of researchers showed that electronic voting systems software from Diebold Election Systems had “stunning, stunning flaws.”
These voting booths, equipped with computer-chipped smart cards that could be remotely manipulated quite easily.
In 2010, the District of Columbia set up a fake voting program and encouraged hackers to attempt to corrupt their system. One hacker group was successful in changing the votes, showing that electronic voting systems are easily manipulated.
The online voting option is still a hopeful option as an alternative for the 20% of the 2.5 military voters that would otherwise send in absentee ballots, according to the Military Voters Protection Project.
The globalization of American voting has begun with the purchase of the process to be overseen by a private corporation controlled by SOE software which operates under the name Clarity Elections.
Local elections will be funneled through SOE servers and the voting reports will then be sent electronically to a centralized and privately held server which is globally based.
SOE is merged with SCYTL and through this the online voting system will ultimately be controlled by the internationally owned SCYTL. However, this system lacks a chain of custody. No physical ballots to count and no evidence other than the electronic data base to prove the results of an election.
SCYTL, based out of Barcelona, Spain, is already controlling elections results in the UK, France, Canada, Norway, Switzerland, the United Arab Emirates, South Africa, India and Australia. SCYTL’s funding comes from international venture capital funds which includes Nauta Capital, Balderton Capital and Spinnaker.
Globalist George Soros, having heavily investing in SCYTl, yields tremendous influence over the fate of the corporation. That is how financial control over corporations is handled by the global Elite. Media Matters, Soros’ media propaganda machine, had scathing remarks for FOXNews for revealing Soros connection to SCYTL.
Michelle Shafer, director of communications & government affairs at Scytl USA & SOE Software, also denied Soros connection to their corporation. However, Shafer lied when hse said that SCYTL was based out of Tampa, Florida. She must have forgotten that the actual corporation was located in Spain, while contracting with governments worldwide.
The UK was stunned by a report published by the Electoral Reform Society. The globalists at the international think-tank TED want us to believe that they have come up with a new system that prevents fraud. In 2010, David Bismark demonstrated his work at a TED Conference.
Bismark asserts that his system design allows each voter to get a takeaway slip that record the vote and ensures that elections are independently verified.
Gallop Polls conducted in March of this year showed that Americans are not thrilled with having just two choices when it comes to the 2012 elections. Forty percent of Americans are considering themselves independents.
Wes Benedict, former executive for the Libertarian National Committee, remarks that “Americans are accustomed to having two teams”. Relating the fascination with sports, Benedicts says that Americans view politics the same; a two party system. “They think there’s only two choices. Republicans and Democrats; a two team mentality.”
A duopoly is a two party dictatorship where both sides appear to be separate, yet truly represent the same agenda. Here in America, the Republican and Democrats have proven themselves to be a clear example of a duopoly. And this fact has made Americans tired of the political farce that comes into play every four years.
The American duopoly serves the corporate interests of the “elected” person who seats the White House. As Americans become aware of the role corporations and special interests play in policy decisions on Capitol Hill, the distain for both parties is changing the methods by which voters want to play the political game.
Earlier this year, Mitch McConnell, Senate Majority Leader, speaking to the globalists at the Heritage Foundation, termed the false flag propaganda war on terrorism rhetoric when he said our democratic voting system is a “threat”. He was citing grassroots efforts what can have a hefty sway when determining a presidential election by way of the popular vote.
McConnell is referring to the sway of swing states, what he terms “disproportionate power”, and the national popular vote that has more power over determining a president’s ability to win an election. States give their Electoral College votes to the popular vote winner, thus attributing more leverage on the outcome of the election. Once a majority of Electoral College votes are attributed, this ensures that the vote is democratic in nature.
This means our president elect is the one who received the majority of the popular vote.
Considering this attitude, it is no wonder that the voting system is being digitized for ease of control since our elected officials are so threatened by Americans exercising their Constitutional right to choose freely who governs them.
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).
Contributed by Susanne Posel of Occupy Corporatism.
Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism, an alternative news site dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporate-funded mainstream media. You can find Occupy Corporatism on their Facebook page .