10 Years of Climate Data Shows No Sign of Global Warming

| |

Our grid depends on this mineral

global warming

Over the years the government and the scientific community have largely stood their ground when it comes to climate change. They’ve been adamant in their assertion that the planet is gradually warming due to human activity, and that we all need to do our part to stop climate change. However, the data provided by the scientific community doesn’t always jibe with their claims.

At least, that seems to be the case with the data coming out of NOAA’s climate monitoring stations. They have a series of 114 stations across all 50 states, which is known as the US Climate Reference Network. For the past 10 years they’ve shown no sign of global warming. In fact, there’s been a very slight cooling in temperatures across the US.

climate data

Granted, 10 years is a pretty short period of time in the big scheme of things, and it would be not be sufficient to draw a definite conclusion on the matter. But other studies have found that there has been no global warming over the past 18 years, and NASA’s records reveal that there has been no significant ice cap melt since they started collecting data in 1979.

So what do you think? Does this prove that global warming is a farce, or is there something we’re not taking into account?

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).


Contributed by Joshua Krause of The Daily Sheeple.

Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshua’s reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshua’s website is Strange Danger .

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • Gil G

    Strange how actual scientists can’t find the “magical” pause that deniers can.

    • http://www.shitsenders.com Я0llyJ0g3r

      Well these real scientists beg to differ and there are 31,487 of them: petitionproject.org

    • Mike

      Gil, funny how folks like you take the government’s falsifying data to find another way to tax us to death as science.

      • Michelle Lee

        Probably a paid troll, they are every where these days!

    • jim_robert

      Strange how utterly ignorant you anti-science BIG GREEN MONEY warmers are Here, Einstein, get a clue:

      “Since I am no longer affiliated with any rganization nor receiving any funding, I can speak
      quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical.” – Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the
      first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of
      the last 100 years.”

      “Inevitably in climate science, when data conflicts with models, a small coterie of scientists
      can be counted upon to modify the data…That the data should always need correcting to agree with models is totally implausible and indicative of a
      certain corruption within the climate science community.” Dr. Richard Lindzen, MIT

      Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what
      the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” – UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD nvironmental physical chemist.

      “The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t have
      open minds… I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists,” – Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet.

      “Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on
      climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” –
      Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of
      the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.

      “The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC “are incorrect because they only are based on
      mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.” – Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico

      “It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” – U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division
      of NOAA.

      “Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as
      water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.” – . Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ.

      “After reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri’s asinine comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it’s hard to remain quiet.” – Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who
      specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society’s Probability and Statistics Committee and is an
      Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review.

      “For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not
      warming? For how many years must cooling go on?” – Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at
      Uppsala University in Sweden.

      “Gore prompted me to start delving into the science again and I quickly found myself solidly
      in the skeptic camp…Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.” – Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland, who reversed his belief in man-made warming to become a skeptic, is a former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee.

      “Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting
      warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined.” – Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and
      Coordination Center in Pittsburgh.

      “Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on
      climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” –
      Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of
      the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.

      “CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another….Every scientist knows this,
      but it doesn’t pay to say so…Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver’s seat and developing nations walking barefoot.” – Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology
      Research at Chubu University in Japan.

      “The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something
      that generates funds.” – Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the
      Committee for Scientific Research in Buenos Aires and head of the Paleontology Department at the University of La Plata.

      “Climate is not responding to greenhouse gases in the way we thought it might. If increasing
      carbon dioxide is in fact increasing climate change, its impact is smaller than natural variation.”Prof Christopher de Freitas, of the University of Auckland, NZ said there was no evidence to suggest carbon dioxide was the major driver of climate change) (In 2003, Dr. de Freitas, who edits the journal Climate Research, had published a peer-reviewed article saying the recent warming is not unusual, relative to
      previous historical climate changes in the past 1,000 years. As you might suspect, Dr. de Freitas had to withstand multiple demands he be fired from his editorial job, as well as his university position.

      “I appreciate the opportunity to add my name to those who disagree that global warming is man
      made,” John Theon wrote to the Minority Office at the Environment and Public Works Committee on January 15, 2009. “I was, in effect, Hansen’s supervisor because I had to justify his funding, allocate his resources, and evaluate his
      results,” Theon is former Chief of the Climate Processes Research Program at NASA

      “Over the years, the IPCC has changed from a scientific institution that tries to be
      policy relevant to a political institution that pretends to be scientific. I regret that. There are already more than enough climate activists, while there are too few solid and neutral bodies that make down-to-earth and well-founded
      statements about climate change and climate policy.” Economist Richard Tol, in a prepared statement for the Dutch parliament examining climate-related controversies

      Interestingly, even IPCC uber-warmer Ken Trenberth has stated “It’s very clear we do not have a climate observing system… This may be a shock to many people who assume that
      we do know adequately what’s going on with the climate, but we don’t.”

      Professor Emeritus Friedrich Karl Ewert a geologist from Paderborn University noted
      the “evaluation of long-term temperature readings . . . disprove that we have man-made global warming,” and presented the results of his analysis at a CFACT meeting in 2011 that of over 1,100 temperature curves from around
      the world, concluding, “the final result is that in 74% of all stations of the world we had no warming.” While the UN has often been told there will be terrible consequences if the CO2
      concentration in the atmosphere remains at or increases from the current 390
      parts per million (ppm), Dr. Ewert pointed out that “in the geological past, we had the greatest glaciation of the earth (the glacier went down to 35
      degrees north) when we have carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere of 1400
      [ppm]. That means it was several times higher than today.” In other words,
      the historical evidence proves CO2 does not control earth’s climate. Dr. Ewert
      summarizes “It is necessary to conclude that the particular effect of manmade carbon dioxide production is not recognizable, in other words, does not exist.”

      • Gil G

        Yes because Little Oil peddlers have get a second job just to make ends meet.

      • sharonsj

        A few dissenting scientists means shit and the petition you list is signed by people who are not necessarily climate scientists. 97% of the world’s climate scientists say there is global warming and climate change. The hottest days on record have all occurred in the last 10 years. And for the record, the sea level is rising; that’s why numerous inhabitants on smaller islands have had to be evacuated.

        Back in 2006, the Pentagon released a 28-page report (which I read) that says climate change is not only real but a threat greater than terrorism. Last time I posted this, some conservative dimwit wouldn’t believe it since the Pentagon is run by “liberals and Commies.”

        No matter how many times Fox News or Rush tell you climate change is a Democrat plot, you will still be flooded out, run out of drinking water, be hit by tornadoes and hurricanes, and, no matter how many wolves she shoots from a helicopter, Sarah Palin’s house in Alaska still will sink because the permafrost is melting.

    • straight shooter

      Oh, stand back, everyone, real bright light just entered the room.

    • Just Me

      Are you a troll?

  • MrAnthill

    Why worry about the weather? Ten years is negligible, and your lifetime is not even a twinkling of an eye,

  • Gearmoe

    More accurately a climate shift vs climate change. Weather moves around like a wave. Some change but mostly different, a shift.

  • socoloco

    “What do I do with all these worthless carbon credits I bought?”

    • Gregory Walls

      Feed ’em to Gil G. Sheep love carbon credits!

      • RandyJ/ProudSurvivor

        They’re best with bacon & grilled onions!

  • RandyJ/ProudSurvivor

    10 Years of Climate Data Shows No Sign of Global Warming-but ensures another 10 years of the “scientific” community lying about it.

    • http://www.shitsenders.com Я0llyJ0g3r

      Now there is a prediction I actually believe in.

  • Occams

    I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but the US is not ‘the world’.

    Juneau just saw record-smashing heat, India saw human-killing temperatures of 122 degrees, I just crossed Northern Italy, and it was already 40c (104) – waaaay beyond normal.

    These ‘figures’ are much like the ‘US unemployment rate of 5.1%’.

    Great numbers – if one ignores reality.

  • jim_robert

    Strange how ignorant BIG GREEN MONEY leftists like Gil below have no idea what peer-reviewed, world-renowned scientists say about faux global warming:

    Strange how utterly ignorant you anti-science BIG GREEN MONEY warmers are Here, Einstein, get a clue:

    “Since I am no longer affiliated with any rganization nor receiving any funding, I can speak
    quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical.” – Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the
    first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of
    the last 100 years.”

    “Inevitably in climate science, when data conflicts with models, a small coterie of scientists
    can be counted upon to modify the data…That the data should always need correcting to agree with models is totally implausible and indicative of a
    certain corruption within the climate science community.” Dr. Richard Lindzen, MIT

    Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what
    the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” – UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD nvironmental physical chemist.

    “The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t have
    open minds… I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists,” – Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet.

    “Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on
    climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” –
    Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of
    the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.

    “The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC “are incorrect because they only are based on
    mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.” – Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico

    “It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” – U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division
    of NOAA.

    “Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as
    water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.” – . Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ.

    “After reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri’s asinine comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it’s hard to remain quiet.” – Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who
    specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society’s Probability and Statistics Committee and is an
    Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review.

    “For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not
    warming? For how many years must cooling go on?” – Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at
    Uppsala University in Sweden.

    “Gore prompted me to start delving into the science again and I quickly found myself solidly
    in the skeptic camp…Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.” – Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland, who reversed his belief in man-made warming to become a skeptic, is a former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee.

    “Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting
    warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined.” – Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and
    Coordination Center in Pittsburgh.

    “Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on
    climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” –
    Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of
    the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.

    “CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another….Every scientist knows this,
    but it doesn’t pay to say so…Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver’s seat and developing nations walking barefoot.” – Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology
    Research at Chubu University in Japan.

    “The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something
    that generates funds.” – Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the
    Committee for Scientific Research in Buenos Aires and head of the Paleontology Department at the University of La Plata.

    “Climate is not responding to greenhouse gases in the way we thought it might. If increasing
    carbon dioxide is in fact increasing climate change, its impact is smaller than natural variation.”Prof Christopher de Freitas, of the University of Auckland, NZ said there was no evidence to suggest carbon dioxide was the major driver of climate change) (In 2003, Dr. de Freitas, who edits the journal Climate Research, had published a peer-reviewed article saying the recent warming is not unusual, relative to
    previous historical climate changes in the past 1,000 years. As you might suspect, Dr. de Freitas had to withstand multiple demands he be fired from his editorial job, as well as his university position.

    “I appreciate the opportunity to add my name to those who disagree that global warming is man
    made,” John Theon wrote to the Minority Office at the Environment and Public Works Committee on January 15, 2009. “I was, in effect, Hansen’s supervisor because I had to justify his funding, allocate his resources, and evaluate his
    results,” Theon is former Chief of the Climate Processes Research Program at NASA

    “Over the years, the IPCC has changed from a scientific institution that tries to be
    policy relevant to a political institution that pretends to be scientific. I regret that. There are already more than enough climate activists, while there are too few solid and neutral bodies that make down-to-earth and well-founded
    statements about climate change and climate policy.” Economist Richard Tol, in a prepared statement for the Dutch parliament examining climate-related controversies

    Interestingly, even IPCC uber-warmer Ken Trenberth has stated “It’s very clear we do not have a climate observing system… This may be a shock to many people who assume that
    we do know adequately what’s going on with the climate, but we don’t.”

    Professor Emeritus Friedrich Karl Ewert a geologist from Paderborn University noted
    the “evaluation of long-term temperature readings . . . disprove that we have man-made global warming,” and presented the results of his analysis at a CFACT meeting in 2011 that of over 1,100 temperature curves from around
    the world, concluding, “the final result is that in 74% of all stations of the world we had no warming.” While the UN has often been told there will be terrible consequences if the CO2
    concentration in the atmosphere remains at or increases from the current 390 parts per million (ppm), Dr. Ewert pointed out that “in the geological past, we had the greatest glaciation of the earth (the glacier went down to 35 degrees north) when we have carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere of 1400
    [ppm]. That means it was several times higher than today.” In other words, the historical evidence proves CO2 does not control earth’s climate. Dr. Ewert summarizes “It is necessary to conclude that the particular effect of manmade carbon dioxide production is not recognizable, in other words, does not exist.”

  • jim_robert

    I am a Canadian who hikes a lot in the Canadian Rockies.

    In contrast to ignoramus warmer Gil below, early pictures from the area vs. today show much glacier recession, at least for some glaciers, such as Bow Glacier, which is the source of the Bow River. The hiking book Classic Hikes in the Canadian Rockies shows this glacier around 1900. If you go there today, the same glacier is much, much receded.

    So, if anti-science BIG GREEN MONEY Gil right? Only if you are as ignorant as Gil. The same anti-science types, who think science is
    determined by “consensus” (of which there is none, not even close) rather than **experimentation and hypothesis testing**, unthinkingly
    look at this and make utterly unwarranted conclusions. The fact of the matter is that there was something called the Little Ice Age (LIA) the nadir of which was the early 1800s. The simple fact is that this was one of the coldest periods since the Ice Age, and we are still emerging from this. THAT, mon ami, is why the Bow Glacier – and its sisters – have receded: we are still emerging from that LIA. This is why, according to the Archeological Survey of Canada,
    the tree line was 100 km. NORTH of where it is today during the MWP (Medieval Warm Period, which was preceded by the similar Roman Warm Period. Incidentally, that emergence from the Little
    Ice Age has stopped over the past dozen years – there has been ZERO global warming since 1998, which now even the co-opted IPCC admits, as did Phil Jones at Hadley , the lead global warmer – until ClimateGate forced him to resign (and you’ll notice the leftists and Agenda 21 scamsters hope you’ll forget Climategate…
    along with Lois LernerGate

    More evidence. Kegwins’ study in Nature on marine radioistopes shows that we are, today, still BELOW the 3,000 year average.
    If you google “Dr. Tim Ball+picea glauca” or go to http://drtimball.com/2012/sensationalist-and-distorted-climate-stories-increase-as-climate-science-failures-exposed/
    you will find a white spruce stump on the coast Canada’s Arctic Ocean, dated about 5,000 years ago, and NOWHERE near today’s treeline. Of course, no one on the left has the intellectual honesty to address any of this.

    The reality is that the left, the BIG GREEN MONEY, and the Agenda 21 types want to control energy, which allows them to
    control everything that touches, which is… well, everything

  • straight shooter

    Wow, I just lost 100 brain cells reading your post. By the way, you’re dumber “than “rocks, not “then” rocks.

  • Anothereno

    If you haven’t heard of it…. There’s these things called
    Grand solar minima and maxima…….. when Global warming got a kickstart in the late 80s/early 90s and early 2000s, we were at solar maximum, some times it can go really high like in the 1950s and other times it can go really low like in the 1800s bringing on what most would call a “mini ice age”

    This is directly related to climate change, more sunspots(more solar activity) hotter it gets, less sunspots (less solar activity) the colder it gets its that simple..

    Having said that, pollution really is a problem, it’s poison, just because we can’t taste things like car exhaust because we’ve become so accustomed to them doesn’t mean they aren’t giving us cancer/health problems, it sure would be nice if the government came out and told us the truth behind their lies on this subject however I really think people are just so lost in their lies upon lies upon lies that they don’t even know they are lying about it anymore.

  • Gil G

    Yes Al Gore the only “climate scientist” and real scientists are seeing a recent global cooling change. Sure

  • MarkoMarkoko

    It is interesting to note the title of this article contains the words “Global Warming” but then offers as negative proof readings only from data from “50 states” over only 10 years. That is hardly “global.”

    Why don’t you sheeple-climate-deniers recognize this as an attempt to fool you with cherry-picked data? Here is an authoritative rebuttal to the assertion of this article: http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-stopped-in-1998.htm

    I suspect that what is really going on here is that Global Warming represents a market failure. In circles where the Free Market has the status of a god, acknowledging this failure is heresy and must be attacked.