10 things the media don’t want to discover about Sandy Hook

| |

Top Tier Gear USA


Slashing through the bland authoritative front the media have presented, people want to know more about the Sandy Hook massacre. But the elite networks have no intention of answering the most obvious questions.

Why? Because the follow-up agenda of gun control is all important, and the official Sandy Hook scenario must stand, in order to forward that agenda.

Any return to the scene of the crime will:

divert media coverage from its all-out push to make guns into taboo objects of scorn, ridicule, fear, and hatred;

focus attention on reasons for the massacre that have nothing to do with guns;

engender deep distrust of the Sandy Hook police investigation and therefore, by association, throw into doubt the notion that law-enforcement personnel should be the only people carrying guns in America.

Here are 10 things the media doesn’t want to know about and has no intention of investigating. These are only the basics, amid a wider sea of unanswered questions:

Where is the video footage from inside the Sandy Hook Elementary School, footage that surely exists and shows some part of the massacre? Who has that video record? What does the video reveal? Where is the video (or photo) evidence that Adam Lanza was the shooter?

How did the accused killer, Lanza, gain entrance to the school? Having just installed a new security system that required outside (and presumably heavy) doors to be locked, and with a procedure for entry that demanded two-way video communication with the principal’s office—what exactly happened?

From available information, it seems almost certain Lanza was seeing a doctor and was on medication. Who was the doctor and what drugs did he prescribe? Did they include SSRI antidepressants like Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil, or Ritalin and Adderall—drugs known to cause violent behavior, including suicide and homicide. If so, then all the focus would shift to excoriating the drugs and eliminating them from our society.

What was the exact story on the two or three other suspects captured and detained by the police? Who are they? Why were they pursued? What did their questioning reveal? Why were they released? No vague generalities. Instead, all the details. And let’s have in-depth television interviews with these suspects.

Once and for all, let’s have a definitive statement on what guns were used in the killings and what guns were found in the trunk of the car. So many lies and contradictions were floated, it’s a sea of confusion. So let’s have the facts—and evidence to back them up. For starters, let’s see photos of the killer and his weapons taken inside the school. Undoctored photos.

What is the detailed explanation for the massive shift from Lanza’s father being killed in New Jersey to Lanza’s mother being killed in Connecticut? No vague generalities. No nonsense about “typical early confusion” in reporting. Let’s see the whole chain of information and the people who forwarded it. Similarly, if the early conclusion pointed to Adam’s brother Ryan as the killer, a conclusion which was withdrawn because Adam was carrying his brother’s ID, explain that. According to reports, Adam hadn’t seen his brother in more than two years. Offer hard evidence that Adam was, in fact, carrying his brother’s ID.

Where are complete statements and interviews with witnesses who were in the school at the time of the shooting? We have seen a few short interviews. There must be more. Let’s have them or get them. Are we to believe (as independent investigator Mike Powell has rightly doubted) that one teacher stuffed all her children into classroom cabinets, which ordinarily are filled with school supplies?

In the television interviews with parents of children murdered in the Sandy Hook School, not one parent was angry, not one parent demanded a deeper investigation. Obviously, this screening of interviewees was purposeful. Where are the outraged parents? What do they have to say? Do they know anything we don’t know? Have they been told (as people were at Columbine) to keep quiet?

And now, as the gun-control agenda is being pursued, precisely how will new laws curb the majority of gun violence in America, violence which is taking place in cities—much of it gang-related. Explain why President Obama doesn’t vigorously and publicly target these high-crime areas, if his objective is to reduce the gun violence, rather than gun ownership.

The pending and often postponed Chicago trial of Jesus Niebla, high-ranking member of the Mexican Sinaloa drug cartel, experiences delay after delay. What vital facts are being kept from the public? There are serious defense charges here; namely, that Niebla and other Sinaloa members have received permanent immunity from prosecution in a prior deal with the DEA and FBI, in return for supplying information on rival cartels. In fact, the US federal government has obtained a suppression of defense-attorney documents in the trial, claiming their exposure would violate National Security.

Does Sinaloa have explicit US government permission to deliver tons of cocaine and heroin into Chicago, and then to cities all over America? This enterprise would certainly, as a side effect, produce a significant amount of gun violence. Does the federal government really want to curb this violence, or is its arrangement with Sinaloa taking precedence?

Finally, in the wake of Sandy Hook, how does President Obama’s declaration that mental-health services will be expanded across America add up to reduction of gun violence? In fact, this will lead to higher levels of prescribed dangerous psychiatric drugs, which in turn will cause a serious escalation in gun violence and mass shootings.

Major media don’t want to know anything about these points. And yet they’re betting they will retain the public trust. But the fact that their ratings are sinking, month after month, year after year, is a message from the public.

The media refuse to hear it, though. They glide through their rehearsed paces and pretend they are captains of information. Their elite owners would prefer to let the media ship go down, rather than tell the truth.

That’s understandable. After all, these owners, and the owners who own them, are guilty of all sorts of crimes, the reporting of which would make ratings soar but destroy their own empires, reputations, and lives.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by Jon Rappoport of No More Fake News.

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALEDEXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Wake The Flock Up! Please Share With Sheeple Far & Wide:
  • ZombieDawg

    “They glide through their rehearsed paces and pretend they are captains of information. Their elite owners would prefer to let the media ship go down, rather than tell the truth.”

    That’s what the MSM does and always has done – blindly regurgitate whatever press release they’re handed. Investigate journalism to determine the truth – what’s that ? LOL..

    Little wonder the MSM is sliding downhill fast globally as people go online for the truth.
    The truth that they CAN understand and WANT to know.

  • jimbo

    Its pick and chose news. They tell the zombies guns bad ok turn them in. Then when the crackheads need cash they will cone to your unprotected home. Maybe you get lucky and live…. As a slave! Live free or die trying! Go Big Blue!

  • Anonymous

    i dont care what the source,read between the lines and cross reference everything…the truth is there

  • Dick

    Where are the wounded? What are the chances EVERY person died?

  • Azura Madza

    Did it even happen at all.


      Something happened there, but no children were killed.

      • Anonymous

        They were alot of paid actors at sandyjoke

  • Robert

    Many people are speaking out about all of the ills we have, but none are stepping up to lead a charge to fix them. I have read many good suggestions as how to fix our problems, but no one is doing anything. Our ship is sinking and no one is pumping or bailing. I hope all of you know how to swim and don’t forget your shark suits..;o)

  • SKIP

    A friend in Conn. when I doubted the actual happening of the Sandy Hook thing said it did for sure as he was just on a cruise with a couple that had lost their daughter in the incident!! WTF!! is that what you do when your young daughter is murdered?? GO ON A FUCKIN VACATION!!

  • Wild Bill

    The way the info on the incident is being well guarded, and no more evidence is released possibly spells Hoax. Why was one of the little girls who died in the incident, photographed on Obama lap after the fact? Why was all the so called parents crying with no tears and appeared somewhat calm? Why did the medical examiner on scene state the kids were shot with an assault weapon when the only assault weapon the shooter had was locked in his car trunk? Why was several federal agency’s in a class dealing with that very kind of incident taking place 20 minutes away? Why was there no footage of any of the surviving kids in any of the news footage? and last but not least the footage of one of the fathers posting a memorial page for his daughter earlier that morning before the incident even took place? Too many questions and no answers. Are we being Hood Winked to push the gun agenda or are they just not wanting the main stream news to report on it any further. You decide!

  • “In the television interviews with parents of children murdered in the Sandy Hook School, not one parent was angry, not one parent demanded a deeper investigation. Obviously, this screening of interviewees was purposeful. Where are the outraged parents? What do they have to say? Do they know anything we don’t know? Have they been told (as people were at Columbine) to keep quiet?”

    Are you suggesting that: (1) the parents are knowingly and willingly covering the murder of their own children? (2) No children were murdered? (3) Parents killed their own children?

    While there are contradictions in the story, c’mon people, suggesting that the parents are either covering up or killed their own children is just plain nuts. That they’re being hushed, I understand but anything else is just not acceptable. And since we’re on the subject, I’d like all of you “smart” people to answer a couple of questions for me that I don’t quite get:

    1. Who works for whom in the US today?
    2. Does the government work for the corporations & the rich?
    3. Or do the corporations and the rich work for the government?
    4. Who benefits from taking away guns from the populace? Government of corporations? (Pls. refer to the first 3 questions.)
    5. If the government benefits (provided they acted independently and were not an arm of the corporations), where does that leave the gun manufacturers and how does that affect their profits from the sale of weapons & ammo to the American sheep?
    6. If the corporations own the government, then, how exactly do they benefit from slashing their own throats by taking away the guns & ammo and resulting sale of weaponry to the citizens?
    7. Are y’all with me so far?

    If, on the other hand, the corporations and the government are independent and operate independently of each other and each for its sole benefit and with a different agenda, then, I understand. Otherwise, I’m afraid y’all are full of hot air!


    • Of course the above questions were based on the premise “if guns are taken away from people” — Then answer questions 1-7. You can’t have it both ways, you people. You can’t have the corporations whose only concern is money and only motive is greed owning the government and wanting to slash their own throats for the sake of control and totalitarianism. CEOs don’t give a hoot about that, all they care about is money and more money thru control. The government, on the other hand, only cares about control and power to subdue the masses for the sole benefit of their corporate masters. You can’t detangle the two or you’ll have nothing and all your whackadoodle theories will turn to dust. Face it, the government doesn’t want to take their guns away, if they did, they’d knock at your door at take them! Just in exactly the same way other totalitarian regime has done in the past. They don’t have to come up with convoluted stories and conspiracies that involve hundredths of people in order to do what they want to. Face reality, you’re all nuts, fanatical and violent and are killing each other are a faster pace than any government can ever do. Don’t go blaming others for your own culture of violence and hatred. Look deep inside yourselves and face the ugly truth. Till you do that, nothing will change and you’ll self-destruct!